WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Bridgerton fans SLAM season three's historical beauty inaccuracies
Program to boost cultural exchanges between China and France
UN human rights chief condemns killings of women and children in Rafah
90 Day Fiance's Stephanie Matto claims she was FIRED by a 'very high
Chinese foreign ministry official on US Secretary of State Blinken's visit to China
Ecuador announces complaint against Mexico at top UN court in diplomatic spat
China's archaeological site parks register strong revenue growth
Mississippi woman pleads guilty to stealing government funds
China ready to strengthen high